I think this is a great idea, but I also have a new idea for how we might
go about using the RESOLVED -> VERIFIED -> CLOSED workflow in BugZilla,
rather than just treating resolved as closed. One thing I noticed about MW
is that we're very much lacking in the test planning area. What if a bug is
marked as verified if either a) somebody makes and commits a test case for
it or b) it is determined that a test case is not applicable. That way
we'll have automated tests ensuring every bug we fix doesn't come back
again. Any thoughts?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo(a)gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Mark A. Hershberger <mah(a)everybody.org>wrote;wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/16/2012 09:17 AM, matanya wrote:
We didn't have a bug triage since May. I
suggest organizing one in
a few weeks (say 2?)
Wow! Thanks for taking this on! I'm busy with non-MW work, but I do
have some time to help out.
Please CC me personally on any triage announcements or ping me on IRC
(hexmode). Thanks!
- --
http://hexmode.com/
Human evil is not a problem. It is a mystery. It cannot be solved.
-- When Atheism Becomes a Religion, Chris Hedges
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFQL7VXc17xCi38v/URAsV7AKCiYFvnnIfSu8sU+/OvVxnboWQWWwCghdMy
JpR0it7vfHlOOfr8OX5VbF8=
=iBFq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l