On 7 July 2011 20:55, MZMcBride <z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
Tim has outlined on this mailing list why he believes
that more infrequent
releases are better, and his arguments are not necessarily invalid, I just
don't think they have any consensus behind them. I think Wikimedia and other
MediaWiki users would like a faster release process. But that's _completely
irrelevant_ when it's one person doing the work and putting together the
final release.
Are we talking about WMF deployments or tarballs here? Speaking as a
tarball user, 2 releases a year, maybe 3, is *just fine*.
- d.