On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra(a)baylink.com> wrote:
He's complaining, in effect, that there are more
than one URL for identical
content, which is in fact generally a bad idea, but in this case, of course,
he's wrong: different *access protocols* are being used, so it's not possible
to conform the two...
Whether it is in fact still a Best Practice to make sure that they're the
same is another matter; I understand *why* we have a separate domain name
for https, architecturally, but I'm not sure I *like* it.
This is something I'd very much like to fix. I had a fairly in depth
discussion with the other ops folks about this last week. I think I'm
going to put it on my goal list; however, we have a lot of higher
priority tasks, so I wouldn't expect anything too soon.
- Ryan Lane