Chad wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Platonides
<Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1
I'm assuming you meant +1 to making it a FT position, but
you didn't quote any text so I cannot be sure ;-)
-Chad
I didn't want to quote the full email ;)
I agree that reviewing the thousands of open bugs* will take a lot of
time. Although if it means the position should be full time would mostly
depend on the importance given to the backlog.
I agree with this mailing list being a proper place to discuss about the
bugmeister position.
After all, this is the people with which the bugmeister should work
(tech staff + tech community).
Neil wrote:
I think he was trying to direct your concerns to where
they would be heard by the right
people and in the right context.
Then the right people should be pointed to follow this thread (whoever
they are, the CTO for a bugmeister position would have been a fair guess).
On the other hand, if this bugmeister discussion was about the budget
allocated to its salary instead of the work it has to do, I would move
that to foundation-l not wikitech-l
*Asking for new/reopen bugs in mediawiki component stops at 2700. There
may be more.