On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:58 AM, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We should definitely highlight real downtime as a
reason for funding,
especially in a way that discusses practical steps that would be taken to
reduce the problem and how much those steps would cost.
Interesting point. Commercial organisations would never issue a press
release highlighting poor performance, because they want people to
think they're getting good value for money. A charity on the other
hand...what does wikipedia have to lose from people thinking its
servers are unreliable due to lack of funding?