2009/3/28 Tim Starling <tstarling(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
The GPL restriction on linking with non-GPL code is
irrelevant for a
non-compiled language, when all we're distributing is the source code.
I could find nothing in the GPL that contradicts this interpretation.
Even for mixed-license projects written in C, it's legal to distribute
the source code, just not the compiled binaries.
I would say RMS would think otherwise. I guess
http://clisp.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/clisp/clisp/doc/Why-CLISP-is-un…
is quite similar.
-- [[cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec]]