On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Brian <Brian.Mingus(a)colorado.edu> wrote:
A general point - there is a *lot* of information
contained in edits
that AbuseFilter cannot practically characterize due to the complexity
of language and the subtelty of certain types of abuse. A system with
access to natural language features (and wikitext features) could
theoretically detect them.
And how poorly would *that* perform, if the current AbuseFilter
already has performance problems? :)