"Anthony" <wikitech(a)inbox.org> wrote in
message news:71cd4dd90708131131k36ef2c17k39d1aae4234b7311@mail.gmail.com...
On 8/13/07, Jay R. Ashworth <jra(a)baylink.com>
wrote:
I guess what has to happen before this can really be discussed is we
need to drop the hypotheticals and come up with a semi-accurate list
of actual conflicts. If a good portion of the conflicts are actually
causing problems, then it's one thing. If most of them are just good
faith collisions which wouldn't have even been discovered were it not
for SUL, then it's another.
As far as I am aware, the time for discussion ended months, if not a year
ago, and now it is simply a matter of waiting for the implementation to be
completed. If that is the case (and correct me if it isn't) then this whole
conversation is somewhat pointless.
- Mark Clements (HappyDog)