<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/16 John Vandenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jayvdb@gmail.com">jayvdb@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
</div>This is a good idea in general.<br>
<br>
However, I suspect that pages consisting only of images have been<br>
marked on <a href="http://en.ws" target="_blank">en.ws</a> as quality0.<br></blockquote><div><br>Yes,you're right; really there's some ambiguity in the meaning of Quality0, it can be used to mark pages that need no transclusion (sometimes, not empty, i.e. "ex libris" image or editor's advertising) or pages that need no proofreading/validation (pages without text, both empty or containing images only). <br>
<br>So, conventions and exact meaning of Quality0 are to be clearly states before ThomasV change is introduced. <br><br>Nevertheless, I'm going to think that proofread, Index-Page version is going to be te real core of wikisource work, and that ns0 tranclusion could be considered merely one from many possible derived works (I deeply appreciate Magnus viewer), therefore any good, useful data added into Index-Page version is very important. <br>
<br>Alex<br></div></div>