<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"><title></title><head><meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><style type="text/css"> html, body {overflow-x: visible; } html { width:100%; height:100%;margin:0px; padding:0px; overflow-y: auto; overflow-x: auto; }body { font-size: 100.01%; font-family : Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; background-color:transparent; overflow:show; background-image:none; margin:0px; padding:5px; }p { margin:0px; padding:0px; } body { font-size: 12px; font-family : Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; background-color: #FFFFFF; } p { margin: 0; padding: 0; } blockquote { padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-top: 0px; } blockquote.quote { border-left: 1px solid #CCC; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; } .misspelled { background: transparent url(//images.gmx.net/images/outsource/application/mailclient/com/gb/resource_4.11.7.0/mailclient/widgets/basic/parts/maileditor/spellchecking_underline.gif) repeat-x scroll center bottom; } .correct {} .unknown {} .ignored {}</style></head><body id="bodyElement" style=""><p size="1" style="font-family: Verdana;">The recent mass bot addition on Portuguese Wikisource (whose "number of articles" overtook French and Chinese) should make us think about changing the main page system. There was a discussion there : http://wikisource.org/wiki/Talk:Main_Page#Changing_the_main_page . Must we adopt the "page views" system, as Wikipedia did, http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikisource/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm ?<br></p><div id="editor_signature"><p style="font-family: Verdana;" size="1"></p><p></p><p></p></div><p></p></body></html>