Great, but I also welcome suggestions of articles where you know interesting things have happened (I can then include both).<br><br>Luca<br><br>PS: When doing a random sample, I can select articles with
> 200 revisions, and that gets rid of the stub problem. <br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 19, 2007 4:07 PM, Brian <<a href="mailto:Brian.Mingus@colorado.edu">Brian.Mingus@colorado.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I can provide a list of the top 40,000 articles rated by quality according to the wikipedia editorial team. A random sample is unlikely to be interesting, as greater than 70% of articles are stubs.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index" target="_blank">
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Dec 19, 2007 5:05 PM, Luca de Alfaro <<a href="mailto:luca@soe.ucsc.edu" target="_blank">
luca@soe.ucsc.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">Oh yes! <br>In fact, if you tell me which article titles you are interested in, I can run those through, and load them in a secondary demo we have.
<br>I may get around to posting the results only in early January though, as the break is fast approaching.
<br><font color="#888888">Luca</font><div><div></div><div><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 19, 2007 4:00 PM, <a href="mailto:draicone@gmail.com" target="_blank">draicone@gmail.com</a> <<a href="mailto:draicone@gmail.com" target="_blank">
draicone@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>On Dec 20, 2007 9:10 AM, Luca de Alfaro <<a href="mailto:luca@soe.ucsc.edu" target="_blank">luca@soe.ucsc.edu</a>> wrote:<br>> That's true. We had to truncate histories to make everything fit into a server.
<br>> We are gaining experience in how to deal with Wikipedia information (terabytes of it),<br>> and we may be able to give a better demo in some time, with full histories, but.... we<br>> need to buy some storage first! :-)
<br><br></div>Could you possibly take a random sample of 2% of articles and examine<br>the full histories of those? 40,000 articles is more than enough for a<br>dem, and we can rig the sample to include some articles of interest if
<br>needed.<br><br>Akash<br></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br></div></div><div class="Ih2E3d">_______________________________________________<br>Wikiquality-l mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org" target="_blank">Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
</a><br><a href="http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l" target="_blank">
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l</a><br><br></div></blockquote></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>