<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Also, when you revert, all of the current versions of the images/templates become the permanent ones for that stable version. So a user reverting to a good version with bad templates would be reviewed.<br><br>-Aaron Schulz<br><br>> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:23:42 -0400<br>> From: gmaxwell@gmail.com<br>> To: aviwiki@gmail.com; wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org<br>> Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Non-editor reverting to stable version<br>> <br>> On 10/9/07, Avi <avi.wiki@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> > I know I'm dropping in a bit late, and perhaps this was already handled, but<br>> > while I was testing this evening, it seems to be that when a non-editor<br>> > reverts a page back to the last sighted version, it still reads current.<br>> ><br>> > Wouldn't it make sense that if the version reverted to is in and of itself<br>> > sighted, that that should be reflected, regardless of the person performing<br>> > the revision?<br>> ><br>> > Or am I missing something?<br>> <br>> Imagine that a user reverts to a year old sighted version and we mark<br>> the new version as sighted. This would result in a decreased amount<br>> of review of the edit and as a result this bad change may go unnoticed<br>> for a longer span of time. Clearly that isn't good.<br>> <br>> What if we only preserve the flagging if they revert to the most<br>> recent? There too we may miss the chance to catch a reversion of good<br>> material. And in this case if the default view were the sighted<br>> revision it moving the pointer really wouldn't help.<br>> <br>> Do these points convince you that the current behavior is better than<br>> your proposal?<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Wikiquality-l mailing list<br>> Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org<br>> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l<br><br /><hr />Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare! <a href='http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews' target='_new'>Try now!</a></body>
</html>