<P>What?! You really believe that NOBODY should EVER be banned?
<P>Zoe
<P> <B><I>Karl Eichwalder <ke@gnu.franken.de></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Jimmy Wales <JWALES@BOMIS.COM>writes:<BR><BR>> Since this would be a system-wide change, not English-only, we should<BR>> discuss it over here, too.<BR><BR>You will not solve a single "problem" by banning. All these problems<BR>are communication problems or these involved parties are simply psycho<BR>cases needing our support.<BR><BR>Thus, no banning actions, please.<BR><BR>> Disadvantages:<BR>><BR>> * Like all banning mechanisms, it could be abused.<BR>> * If the IP is shared by "innocent" parties, they also get blocked.<BR><BR>Yes, these are the side effects making bans even more eval.<BR><BR>-- <BR>ke@suse.de (work) / keichwa@gmx.net (home): |<BR>http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | ,__o<BR>Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,<BR>http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Wikipedia-l mailing list<BR>Wikipedia-l@wikipedia.org<BR>http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l</BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1>Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/mailsig/*http://tax.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Tax Center</a> - File online, calculators, forms, and more