<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/9/2002 8:59:22 AM Eastern Standard Time, daniel@copyleft.no writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><BR>
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Toby Bartels wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> This means that I'm coming out against Neil's plan entirely.<BR>
> As I mentioned under the last heading, his intentions were good,<BR>
> but the plan itself, not just the execution, was IMO flawed.<BR>
> If we want to use the EBD to write Biblically themed articles,<BR>
> then that's great, and I don't expect Neil to do it all himself,<BR>
> but we should set up a Bible article writing group to do it,<BR>
> with human editing for each entry before it appears (in the [[:]] namespace).<BR>
<BR>
I agree. The automatic committing of articles from out dated works should stop.<BR>
<BR>
-- Daniel<BR>
<BR>
[Wikipedia-l]<BR>
To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Also agree. I don't think these articles are worth very much</FONT></HTML>