On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Ian Tresman wrote:
Indeed! There is more to what has been forgotten
than lack of
notability.
It seems to me that you can demonstrate notability, but impossible to
demonstrate non-notability.
In this case, we're not only borderline notable (strange, laughable,
non-science nonsense "Theories" being published, as with Time Cube
and Velikovsky), but we are getting three levels out...
1. obscure college self-published 'zine (which was then run by uhm,
this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Talbott )
-- 2. temporarily publishing a mini series
-----3. on strange, laughable, non-science.
I'm in no real rush to see wikipedia populated with articles, about a
fan-driven college 'zine, writing a little mini-series on some topic.
I don't care if the mini-series is about Britney Spears, Buffy, Navel
lint, Time Cube, *whatever*.
The fact that this obscure 'zine's mini-series is specifically about
somebody who earned his coin complaining that his totally
unscientific ideas weren't treated like, well, (giggle) science,
well.... that just adds to the irony.
-Ronabop