The problem is not what the users do from AOL IPs, it is the way AOL
*assigns* IPs. Right now, if you are an AOL dial-up user, you will be
assigned a new IP every 15 minutes, or every page load, whichever comes
first. Literally *every time you load a page, you will have a new IP*. That
makes blocking problematic AOL users *impossible*. By the time a sysop can
discover and block a given address, the vandal has jumpted IPs at least
once, potentially a dozen times. Additionally, no sooner than the block
button is clicked, a legitimate AOL user with an account will be assigned
that IP, and will be blocked. This is not as much of a problem on smaller
projects, with fewer editors, fewer vandals, (and fewer AOL users as a
result), but it is a serious problem on large projects like en.wikipedia,
where there are thousands of AOL users.
I can think of two users off the top of my head (two of a thousand, maybe
ten thousand similarly affected that I don't happen to know personally) who
are blocked as a result of an AOL IP block nearly *every time they try to
make an edit*. EVERY TIME. The only advice to them is to suck it up, or get
a new ISP. (There is a little known trick that has come to light recently,
but I'm not willing to state it publicly, lest vandals begin abusing it).
These are good users, valuable contributors, who are being prevented from
editing with no recourse.
What we need is not for AOL to take action against vandals; we don't go to
the ISPs of other vandals (routinely) and shouldn't for these. What we *do
need* is for AOL to stop running what amounts to a massive anonymous proxy
service. If AOL would just assign a single IP when a user connects, and
leave them on that IP until they disconnect (which is what most ISPs do, as
I understand it) it would solve a lot of our problems. Not all of them;
there would still be collateral damage autoblocks, because AOL is huge and a
lot of people use it, but at least we could begin to block *the people
responsible for vandalism* instead of carpetbombing AOL users, which is
basically what we do now.
Essjay
On 3/20/06, Stacey Doljack Borsody <hjernespiser(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:06:36 +1000
From: "Craig Franklin" <craig(a)halo-17.net>
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] exicornt switch
To: <wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <001501c64c16$bff788e0$015a5a0a@equinox>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Scr?obh Mark Williamson :
The current situation seems to be that all AOL
users are blocked
pending cooperation from AOL in trying to stop vandalism. This seems
like a good approach to me.
Frankly, I have to agree. I can't see any problem with this.
Is the user violating any AOL AUP term? I highly doubt it so I wouldn't
expect AOL to stop this.
Maybe the user just needs to be left alone and ignored and a campaign
initiated to educate the
public on what the real term of the railroad switch is. :)
.s
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
Essjay
-----
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Essjay
Wikipedia:The Free Encyclopedia
http://www.wikipedia.org/