[Wikipedia-l] Desysopping procedure against waerth

[GerardM]

Hoi,
The situation is deadlocked when everything centers around single
persons. When you want to put it like that there is a crisis, it is
however a personal crisis staged for everyone to see.

I do subscribe to the idea that it would be best for you to stay if
you want to. You have been a valuable contributor and you have been a
valuable vandalfighter. However, given the way you threw your weight
around, I do think it best when you do not force issues in the way you
have done. It is a distraction and it only makes the things you want
to achieve become secondary issues. It is telling that the things that
you want to see happen BECAME secondary because of the strategies that
you employ. This is not the first time that it happened.

You mean well, but the way you do things is detrimental for long term
cooperation.

Thanks,
   GerardM

On 1/18/06, Walter van Kalken <walter at vankalken.net> wrote:
> Tjipke de Vries wrote:
>
> > Andre Engels wrote:
> >
> >> Nevertheless, I think there IS a crisis on the Dutch Wikipedia that
> >> might require intervention.
> >
> >
> > What kind of intervention do you suggest?
> >
> > Tjipke de Vries
> >
> I do not think Andre has an answer to that. Neither have I. The
> situation is deadlocked at the moment. People are urging me by mail to
> stay. Another group would not have that. No one knows what to do. At the
> moment we have all lost.
>
> Waerth/Walter
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>