Andre Engels wrote:
On 9/28/05, Phroziac <phroziac(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Most conlangs should not even be considered. But,
certainly there are
conlangs that are as notable as Esperanto, which we don't have
wikipedias for?
I don't think there is any other conlang "as notable as Esperanto".
Wikipedia currently exists in Esperanto, Interlingua, Ido, Lojban and
Volapük, although the last two aren't very big.
I looked at ISO 639-3 and it proposes to recognize 24 conlangs:
<http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Afrihili&action=edit>Afrihili,
Brithenig, Ceqli, Delason, Dutton World Speedwords, Esperanto, Glosa,
Ido, Interglossa, Interlingua, Interlingue, Jakelimotu, Klingon, Láadan,
Linga, Lojban, Novial, Occidental, Orcish, Quenya, Romanova, Sindarin,
Tceqli, and Volapük This unfortunately includes Klingon. Toki Pona is
not on the list. It looks as though they have dropped Europanto. It
does put their reliability in doubt.
Ec
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l