--- Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> schrieb:
I consider the board is not here to micromanage
things and that natural
leaders or natural groups of decision makers should
appear to make the
final decision on whether to open a new language or
not.
[...]
But once a project has be agreed upon, I do not see
the decision of
opening one language or not being the job of board
members, EXCEPT for
decision such as whether to work in real languages
only, or to accept
constructed languages, because again, it might be a
strategic decision.
My opinion on the matter is simply that languages
such as Klington are
not welcome. And it seems the other board members
agree with this.
This surely sounds sensible. A decision not to allow
constructed languages anymore could certainly be
regarded as a strategic decision. Since the board
seems to be unanimous on this matter and the issue
keeps on coming up again and again - causing
unproductive strife each time - wouldn't it make sense
if the board turned this attitude into an official
policy?
Thus, the community would be disburdened from a
controversial issue that obviously is not really
solvable here and concentrate on making the existing
Wikipedias work and starting successful new ones.
Arbeo
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden:
http://mail.yahoo.de