David Gerard a écrit:
Anthere (anthere9(a)yahoo.com) [050329 15:02]:
However, I just limited myself to vote for its
deletion on the english
wikipedia, and will absolutely accept very willingly any decision the
community will find toward its future.
You realise that action was probably worse than useless:
Uh ?
Giving one's opinion is worse than useless ???
1. It doesn't slow down the vandals one bit - they
routinely create a
username, upload the image then make their edit putting it in place.
The image will keep reappearing as long as the technical facility exists.
Yes, but if the image is voted once for deletion, it should be
automatically redeleted afterwards.
2. The deletion vote has reoccurred so often as to be
vexatious IMO. It
keeps getting nominated for deletion, it keeps getting voted to be kept.
(What's the point, to keep nominating it until you get the answer you
want?)
This was the first time *I* voted.
3. It encourages threads like this has become.
- d.
...
Well, if the current direction is to encourage editors to say nothing at
all when they disagree with a situation, or to flow them under
accusations and insults when they do nevertheless, I think Wikipedia is
in big trouble. It is never a good think to threaten people who try to
give their opinion, and today makes me really wonder what project I am
in all fairness giving my time to.
Ant