That's not so surprising in and of itself.
I think what Milos meant is that there are 3 interwiki links, yet none
to English.
3 versions without an English version is sort of rare, but the fact
that those languages are Japanese, Swedish, and Serbian makes it all
the more peculiar.
Mark
On 07/06/05, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/8/05, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/6/05, Walter van Kalken
<walter(a)vankalken.net> wrote:
Only two articles on ja: do not have an
equivalent on en: ? That is just
a small number. There is 100's if not 1000's that do not have
equivalents on en: I know because I am responsible for at least 40 or 50
or so :)
My suspicion is that what was meant is that two articles had interwiki
links at all that did not include English.
Yes. (Hmm... My English...) Some time ago, I found one more such
article, but I forgot its name. It is not so easy to catch interwiki
for articles which don't exist on en:, but it is possible (we did it
using IRC for relation sr: - ja:; I don't know for the history of sv:
- ja: relation). And I think that it should be noted for history ;)
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE