Daniel Mayer wrote:
--- Jiong Sheng <sheng.jiong(a)gmail.com> wrote on
Wikipedia-l:
Now I think if the ban is still not lifted for
another week, we shall
have a press release about this. I agree with mav that if the whole
world knows about it Chinese government will lift the ban, just like
what it did to Google in 2002.
I know at least Slashdot will cover the story. But whether or not the story
goes beyond that is up to the news cycle at the time.
We do need to confirm that this is
1) real
2) not a mistake
Otherwise we could be creating a lot of bad press for ourselves (I don't
believe in the adage that there is no such thing as bad press). If we do this
right, then we could at the very least garner a great deal of public support
and increased awareness of the project. Hopefully that will be enough to shame
the PRC into lifting the block. It is sad to think that the recent good press
about the Chinese Wikipedia may have been what brought the PRC's attention to us.
I agree that this requires a careful and measured approach. Our primary
objective should be to ensure access for users living in the PRC.
"Commie bashing" or railing about the lack of civil rights in China may
only convince them to tighten things up even more.
We first of all need to be sure of our facts in the matter to avoid
making accusations that have no foundation in reality. A cooperative
attitude can also be helpful. It would help to know just where the
decision came from, and whether there is an accessible higher level
bureaucrat who might overrule the decision. It may even be that their
requirements are within acceptable levels; we shouldn't presume that
they aren't. It would be great if the appropriate officials could be
convinced that there is some benefit for the PRC as a whole in having
Wikipedia available to its people.
Another
possible choice is to consult a lawyer in PRC. There was a
case last December, when a Hong Kong reporter brought a political
magazine into mainland and was confiscated by the Custom. He sued the
local government and won the case. I believe that we have to fight for
this freedom. If we keep quiet then they will never lift the ban.
Lawyers are expensive (even pro-bono ones). So I hope this does not come to
that. We could set up a Wikimedia legal defense fund to help pay the expenses
of pro-bono lawyers if the need arises though.
Yes, they are expensive, but we are not looking at lawyers with United
States style fee structures. At this point first level lawyer contact
would be useful. Its purpose would be to discuss in broad terms what
applicable laws and strategies are available. This does not imply that
there will ever be any active court case or any other kind of formal
procedure. A peaceful settlement of the issue will always be the
preferred option.
Ec