[Wikipedia-l] Re: Klingon resurrected
Ralesk Ne'vennoyx
ralesk at livejournal.com
Wed Jun 9 08:41:33 UTC 2004
Erik Moeller wrote:
> It's difficult to ignore Klingon when it is plastered over 50 Main Pages
> and added as interlanguage links to thousands of serious articles about
> human history, politics and religion. That was always my main concern and
> the compromise addresses this problem.
>
And how can KlingonWP not produce the same in the long run?
> By the way, Klingon now has 5 articles, and guess what they're about?
> Fictional worlds and concepts from Star Trek. The word "Star Trek" appears
> in none of them, so I suspect they don't even establish that they are
> fictional. This is the kind of Pandora's Box we are opening here.
>
I'm afraid you are being very paranoid there.
More information about the Wikipedia-l
mailing list