[Wikipedia-l] Fair Use material in Wikipedia

[Sean Barrett]

> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:27:41 -0800
> From: Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net>
> X-Accept-Language: en-us
> Reply-To: wikipedia-l at Wikimedia.org
> Sender: wikipedia-l-bounces at Wikimedia.org
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
> 	orwen.epoptic.com
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no 
> 	version=2.61
> 
> Sean Barrett wrote:
> 
> >I find this entire argument about "fair use" images annoying.  When I
> >contacted Her Majesty's Stationery Office to inquire about the use of
> >Crown Copyright material, I was told that Wikipedia could use that
> >material as long as we used it accurately and not disparagingly -- no
> >problem -- but that we also had to require that anyone else using it
> >had to also comply with those restrictions.  Opinion was overwhelming
> >that since we can't pass on those restrictions, even though we have no
> >problem complying with them ourselves, we can't use the material.
> >
> >What's the difference?
> >
> This type of restriction seems reasonable.  I can't see why we can't 
> just tag the image as "subject to UK Crown Copyright" which links to a 
> page of ours that describes those restrictions.  This is a requirement 
> rather than a restriction; there is no need to put more into the meaning 
> of "require" than is already there.
> 
> Ec

Fine with me, as long as no one is ever allowed to make the mistake of
thinking that images so tagged are licensed under the GFDL.  HMSO
have clearly expressed their opinion that Crown Copyright is NOT
compatible with the GFDL, and may well reiterate that opinion more
forcefully if we choose to ignore their earlier statement.

-- 
 Sean Barrett     | Pobezhdaiut ne chislom, a umeniem.
 sean at epoptic.com |