Richard Grevers wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
>>Magnus Manske writes:
>>>Why not "*.wiki"?
>Simplicity!
>I originally used "wiki markup language"
(WML) on the grounds that
>I wasn't going to distinguish between the different wiki markup languages.
But wouldn't most systems try and parse that as
Wireless Markup Language?
Are there actually any three-letter combinations left unused by Mime types
and software data formats?
That's already been mentioned.
I wasn't clear, but my comment after Magnus' proposal was one of approbation.
Since *.wml is no good for the reasons given, I support *.wiki.
-- Toby