So what do you do when you've gone back 15 edits, reverted to a clean version,
incorporated all of the "good" changes that have happened since then, and the
original perpetrator then comes along and adds his/her "bad" changes again? How
long are you supposed to keep doing that?
Zoe
Toby Bartels <toby+wikipedia(a)math.ucr.edu> wrote:Ed Poor wrote in part to another
poster:
Should I go back,
say, 15 edits ago (to yesterday's "clean" version) and edit that? I
can't
figure out whether that's bending over to accommodate anti-social behavior
-- or that's anti-social in itself.
I don't know about Mark, but I think that you should do just that.
It's safer than banning people and easier for the ordinary user
(that is, a regular contributor that has not undertaken admin duties)
to revert in the case that you've made a mistake.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site