In Wikipedia case, most people will only go to one of
the links most of time. So a portal is not very
interesting maybe? Except if on the second connexion,
the user is directly brought to the right
xx.wikipedia.org. Otherwise, it is a lack of time.
But if on the second connexion the user is brought to
the
xx.wikipedia.org, he will rarely go to the
www.wikipedia.org and maybe is it loosing something.
No ?
Besides, you will notice I used the word "partners". A
portal tends to atomize things rather than to
interlink them.
Does what I say make more sense now ? Do you think I
am wrong in my feeling or not ?
You make some good points. What would you have on the page to make it more consistently
useful?
kq