--- Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)bomis.com> wrote:
Daniel Mayer wrote:
> 6) State that we have no intention of ever removing
es.wikipedia.com > >
but we could point that URL to the Seville server
is they wish to
stay on that
server.
I don't think this is acceptable. Without sever unity, there is no
way for us to enforce openness. If they start to ban people for
political reasons, forming a 'cabal', we would be powerless to stop
them.
In other words: we want them back on our US server, so that we, and not
they, are in control. We know who should be banned, but we don't trust
them with such decisions. Maybe we should say that clearly at the
beginning; it will shorten the discussion considerably.
Axel
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com