Suppose that some copyright owner sues Bomis for
infringement and damages
that force Bomis and Jimmy into bancruptcy. Too bad
for them. But the
contents of Wikipedia is still available under GFDL
and I suppose many
people on this list have complete copies at home,
from which they can
remove the offending material and put the project up
on a new website.
So I don't think the project is at risk.
One of the ideas behind licensing everything under the
GFDL is to allow people to create derivative works
legally. If we, as a project, are not careful about
copyrights, why should anyone trust us when we say,
"Go ahead! Use our material. It's GFDL."? Our
credibility is the issue here.
Lars, if you don't care about Jimmy's legal risk and
don't care if he and Bomis go bankrupt, that's
certainly your perogative. You don't have to remove
any questionable material. But I'm going to remove it
so that people won't have to wonder if using Wikipedia
articles under the terms of our license is really ok.
-- Stephen Gilbert
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com