<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 22:20, Gautam John <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gautam@prathambooks.org">gautam@prathambooks.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<p>Not really a Wikipedia model, what?</p>
<p>Crying shame about the license.</p></blockquote><div>Only valid concern is about license, but then if its about bridging the gap between policymakers and general public, I feel it will be yet another "tam-tam" site from govt and will have no encyclopedia content. We could still use the content as RS since it comes from govt.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<p>Wondering if the Chapter and the Office can do anything?</p></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; ">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">FYI: Arthapedia is available at <a href="http://arthapedia.in/" target="_blank" id="" style="color: rgb(17, 85, 204); ">arthapedia.in</a></font></span></blockquote>
<div> </div><div>I dont think there is a room for involvement since the goals are not even intersecting except that they use Mediawiki. Looking at the site, an academy about how to put Wiki texts(syntax), making successful Interlinked content can be given a shot, but then it will help only their project and public over all and may be a fraction of them editing Wikipedia. Currently they are just copy pasting documents without interlinking. Some Mediawiki help(tips/advice) too can be given.</div>
<div> </div></div>-- <br>Regards<br>Srikanth.L<br>