... and I have yet to search for 'Bankimchandra Bose' :)<br>BTW, I was startled to read that many of the Indian languages are *still* tagged as "regional" languages, (factually, they are "official" languages as far as Republic of India is concerned and some of them have official status across multiple nations)<br>
<br>But ya, I agree with Tinu; this article did its job to bring Indic language wikipedias in focus.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Sankalp<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/3/25 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wikimediaindia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org">wikimediaindia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On 25 March 2011 15:51, CherianTinu Abraham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tinucherian@gmail.com" target="_blank">tinucherian@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+ more..<div>* Shiju and me are referred as Tamil Wikipedians. <br>* Jim Wales instead of Jimmy Wales </div><div>* 22 Indian lang Wikipedias instead of 20</div><div><br></div><div>Honestly, It is very rare we can get a completely error free media article , how much ever we help and participate closely. Can't always help it but unfortunately it is the way it is. Sometimes they make lots of goof-ups that I myself is embarrassed to send it to the mailing list. </div>
<div><br></div><div>However glad to see this article at least tried to cover Indian language Wikipedias in focus.</div><div><br></div><div>I was told, that the print edition is already available in Delhi, but for other locations, it may hit the news stands by the weekend.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div>Tinu Cherian </div><div><br></div><div><br></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div><br>