<div>Just to clarify a little , CC by SA is also a copyright license. The only difference is that these licenses allow creators to communicate which rights they reserve, and which rights they "waive" for the benefit of recipients or other creators.</div>
<div><br></div><div><div class="msg 1st">There is a common miunderstanding that Wikipedia articles are not copyrighted and all free software are not copyrighted, which is not in actual. </div><div class="msg 1st"><br></div>
<div class="msg 1st">And also Google cannot put another copyright for their articles in any wiki, because they are already CC by SA on Wikipedia. </div><div class="msg 1st"><br></div><div class="msg 1st">Regards</div><div class="msg 1st">
Tinu Cherian</div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:47 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wheredevelsdare@hotmail.com">wheredevelsdare@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
Hi Tinu Cherian,<br><br>You might want to remind the journo that we (Wikipedia) are non profit and our info comes under CC-BY-SA license, however Google is a Business set up for profit with all their info being subject to copyright.<br>
<br>Regards,<br>User:AroundTheGlobe<br><br>> <br>> <br>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> than "Re: Contents of Wikimediaindia-l digest..."<br>> <br>> <br>
> </div></blockquote></div></div>