<blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">We have users in Tamil Wikipedia who bulk upload 100s of complete articles they wrote offline with just one edit per article. <br>
</blockquote><br>That happens in all the wikipedias which has an active community. That might also be possible with the the Google translation project. <br><br>In general, quality of a wiki article improves as more people work on it. More edits from more number of users means more quality on the wiki article. Otherwise there is no difference between a knol/blogpost and a wiki article. :)<br>
<br><blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"><b>"Depths above 300 for <a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#Notes" title="List of Wikipedias" target="_blank">Wikipedias</a> below 100 000 articles have been automatically dismissed as irrelevant."</b><br>
</blockquote><br>Who has mentioned about the depth in the below mail?<br><br><blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">When we focus on number of articles, some end up creating useless stubs.
The same should not happen when we focus on edit counts. </blockquote><br>Yes. All wikis has stubs and almost of the articles are created as stub articles. <br><br>Shiju<br><br><blockquote style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">
<br></blockquote><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ravishankar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ravidreams@gmail.com">ravidreams@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Its not just about stubs. <br><br>We have users in Tamil Wikipedia who bulk upload 100s of complete articles they wrote offline with just one edit per article. One great article can be uploaded in one click and one mediocre article can have 100s of edits. <br>
<br>According to <br><div class="im"><br><a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias" target="_blank">http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias</a><br><br></div><b>"Depths above 300 for <a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#Notes" title="List of Wikipedias" target="_blank">Wikipedias</a> below 100 000 articles have been automatically dismissed as irrelevant."<br>
</b><br><div class="gmail_quote">When we focus on number of articles, some end up creating useless stubs. The same should not happen when we focus on edit counts. <br><br>Ravi<div class="im"><br><br><br>On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:18 AM, CherianTinu Abraham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tinucherian@gmail.com" target="_blank">tinucherian@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">What probably Arjuna meant was that, some of Wikipedias are more welcoming to the creation of stub articles. I am not saying that Malayalam Wikipedia doesn't though... <div>
<br></div><div>-Tinu Cherian <div><div></div><div><br><br></div></div></div></blockquote><br></div></div><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Wikimediaindia-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>