David, just out of curiosity, do you actually read most posts on this
mailing list? Or monitor Commons? I'll be typing up an additional response
on Commons later today as I have the time but the last time you asked why I
wasn't engaging on Commons the answer was, quite literally, because I
hadn't finished typing my post on commons yet, and had it up within five
minutes of your post (and hadn't seen your post until after I had it up.)
Could you please point out again where I'm refusing to engage with the
community in question?
In the meantime, I'd still love to hear the reasonable articulation that
this wasn't a violation of POLA that you keep seeming to suggest exists.
----
Kevin Gorman
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 May 2014 20:47, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I think David was reacting to your bold assertion
that the next time you
determine Commons has violated a Board resolution, drastic action would
be
taken. This suggests some certainty on your part
that the Board and
stewards agree with your judgment. I haven't seen evidence of that. You
can
certainly advocate that action be taken, but dire
warnings of certain
consequences seem a bit beyond your authority to issue.
I was more disagreeing with the implicit claim that this was such an
obvious slam dunk that Kevin could get action on it while explicitly
refusing to engage with the community in question, literally on the
grounds that he'd previously been so disruptive they'd spoken of
banning him. That last bit really doesn't suggest the case is very
strong.
- d.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>