On 13 May 2014 07:27, Pete Forsyth <peteforsyth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On May 12, 2014 9:10 PM, "Kevin Gorman"
<kgorman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
the fact Commons' has a history of not
wanting to comply with WMF board
resolutions
Whoa there, I'm going to have to reach for my biggest [citation needed]
flag.
Commons isn't a thing that speaks with a single voice, and -- more
importantly -- with literally hundreds of files proposed for deletion every
day, there are bound to be plenty of decisions that are either wrong, or
debatable. Whatever experience you're generalizing on to make this sweeping
statement of an entire project "not wanting to comply," I am pretty
confident you are making a leap of logic or two in there.
+1 I have no recollection of becoming part of a Borg collective.
...
We can go back and forth as long as you want --
I'd suggest you start off
with maybe 5 examples, and if you do I'll find 25. But do as many as you'd
like.
Let's not go there. This email thread is TLDR, hard to follow, and (as
has been said by several others already) would be much better as an
on-wiki narrative thread in one of the many places on Commons where
discuss policies and issues of interest to Commons contributors; most
of us are not subscribed to this email list.
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae