I've been seeing the discussion on the APG proposal for the past one month.
Concerns and comments from community members, Wikimedians from and beyond
India indicates that the actions of CIS in the past and what they says in
the proposal to do in future, have raised serious concerns among
Wikimedians and those involved with the movement. Those who are not yet
aware of this, please look over the situation and help take the issue in
proper way.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Hari Prasad Nadig <mail(a)hpnadig.net> wrote:
Fellow Wikimedians,
There were several concerns raised about the CIS India's APG Proposal here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/…
Despite those, the FDC process seems to be moving on, with apparently the
staff assessment not taking the comments from the community into account
seriously. My concerns about this are stated here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals/2013-2014_round2/…
Kindly participate in the discussion and help steer this in the right
direction.
Thank you,
--
Hari Prasad Nadig
http://hpnadig.net
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/hpnadig
FlickR:
http://flickr.com/hpnadig
Wikipedia: [[User:HPN]]
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Regards -
Tanweer Morshed