>By which I which I don't mean to say most
literature is useless or a
fraud: it's not! But it's also not a 100% black
or white picture. -- phoebe
The 'not perfect ' fallacy.
Peer reviewed literature is not perfect
Wikipedia is not perfect
Ergo, Wikipedia is equally good as peer reviewed literature
You can see that's not valid, right?
All I can say is that from my experience of my limited area of
expertise, Wikipedia articles on the subject fall far short of what you
would find elsewhere (e.g. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
E