James, you are confusing everyone.
The WMF does not currently engage in advocacy of that form, except in
support of strong support for a particular position by the community.
If you want to see that change, please discuss it with community
groups or the board, not WMF staff. You are welcome to develop that
idea as a potential strategic goal on Meta and organize public
discussion around it.
If you want to get involved with advocacy within the Wikimedia
movement, try working with groups like WMDC ('Wiki Loves Capitol
Hill'), WMDE ('Politics and Society'), and other chapters and
affiliates that have taken advocacy positions in their regions.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Deutschland/2014_annual_plan/en#P…
http://wikimediadc.org/wiki/Home
Sam
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:06 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Sue,
Since you announced your departure, to whom have you
delegated the responsibility of insuring that Foundation
advocacy is aligned with the interests of Foundation volunteers,
if anyone?
Do you support statistical sampling using a method such as at
http://www.allourideas.org/wmfcsdraft
to determine volunteer interests and priorities?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266