From: peter.southwood(a)telkomsa.net
To: wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 12:32:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] the big red notice on the top of
http://strategy.wikimedia.org
- done
Makes sense to me too.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Alexander" <jamesofur(a)gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] the big red notice on the top of
http://strategy.wikimedia.org - done
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Bohdan Melnychuk <base-w(a)yandex.ru> wrote:
>
>> But we close wiki. We not set wiki read only. Why should we use another
>> therm than the procedure is called?
>
> Because what we DO (no matter what we call it) is set it as Read Only, it
> is still 100% accessible you just can't edit it. I think it does make
> sense
> that 'read-only' is more understandable then 'close' which sounds
like we
> completely shut it off and you can't read it either.
>
> James
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: