The question is whether that is implicit, and whether that is necessary at
all. I find the argument that for government works we only have to bother
about the law of the source country, very persuasive.
2014-06-23 14:27 GMT+02:00 geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>om>:
On 23 June 2014 13:00, Ilario Valdelli
<valdelli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In my opinion as soon the letter is submitted
through OTRS, the same
letter
releases this content and defines that it's
allowed to have it in
Commons.
URAA extends the copyright, it doesn't block the possibility to renounce
to
the copyright.
Nothing in the letter renounces copyrights held outside Israel.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>