On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:52 AM, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What if the tiny fraction of people who were open to examination of
their merits were more aligned with the positions of the peer reviewed
literature reviews? That seems very likely.
while agreeing to an open interview could definitely be an asset, it
definitely is not THE ONLY quality that is needed, while requiring it would
effectively make it a threshold criterion, severely limiting the poll.
Clearly, we're not in a situation of too many top quality candidates, by
far exceeding all other requirements. Thus I don't think it is reasonable
to narrow the possibilities that much. What Mike Peel wrote in the other
thread makes sense though and is an option that the Board may consider (if
they find it useful).
best,
dj "pundit"
--
__________________________
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczego CROW
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
http://www.crow.alk.edu.pl