On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Fæ <faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is not the first time that Erik has been
sarcastic and rude in an
apparent attempt to close down discussion in public responses to
whistle-blowers.
Please. You are making a mockery of every whistleblower on the planet;
it's disgraceful. Russavia's original post cites examples such as
editing about a coffeeshop or a school. They're frivolous examples,
pointless, trollish, part of a sequence of behavior to mix the
occasional legitimate concern with wild insinuations and conjecture.
You tend to join these types of threads with cheerful and seemingly
limitless energy to attempt to whip up tiny shitstorms. This has
turned far too many conversations into the Fae/Russavia traveling
circus, with both of you demanding individual explanations from the
Board for why someone pooped.
I have a ton of respect for Pete and I'm not discounting the merits of
a conversation about how such editing should be handled, but I am
cautioning very strongly against overreacting, because it can
introduce very pernicious long term effects into our movement.
Erik
--
Erik Möller
VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation