Imo having a centralized funding model is very good against corruption (we
had a couple of cases already and unfortunately we will some in the future)
As a side comment, it would be nice if we could learn the total
donations/country figures ( for example: Hungary 2013: $12,345.67) If this
info is already public then sorry, I was unable to locate it myself.
Balazs
2014-04-10 16:20 GMT+02:00 <mathias.damour(a)laposte.net>et>:
Hi,
Message du 10/04/14 15:28
De : "Anders Wennersten"
A : wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [Wikimedia-l] Funding of decentralized organizational
structure
(...)
And I would be unhappy if the divergence between project became too big,
POV paid editing etc we will be stronger as a totality if we abide to the
same base guidelines So I question your urge and need to decentralize. For
am as a contributer the most important part is that I know my inputs is
securely stored and will not be misused by actors like google or plain
advertising. And for this reason I believe in a centralized structure as
about today (for now) Anders
I don't tink that Ting Chen is disputing that the WMF should keep the core
work. Yet the core work may mean about 20% of the movement resources
instead of 90%...
Mathias
[[User:Astirmays]]
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>