[Foundation-l] Porchesia

[James Hare]

Well, if we make it a new criterion, we shouldn't apply it retroactively. I
understand there was a time when sources didn't mean as much.

As for the unsourced articles that currently exist, we could do some very
long PROD deal with it -- articles tagged as having zero sources have three
months to get at least ONE SOURCE for any part of the article before it
qualifies for speedy. That's a generous amount of time.

On 9/30/06, George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/30/06, James Hare <messedrocker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let's mkae a new speedy criterion: if there's no sources, nuke it. With
> > fire.
> >
> > On 9/30/06, daniwo59 at aol.com <daniwo59 at aol.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have just deleted an article, [[Porchesia]]. Any admins are welcome
> to
> > > read the history. It was created in November.
> > >
> > > Problem is, there is no such place.
> > >
> > > Hmmm.
> > >
> > > Danny
>
> Are you suggesting that this is the proper solution to any
> {{unsourced}} article?
>
>
> --
> -george william herbert
> george.herbert at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>