[Foundation-l] Hi, Jimmy Wales, Is there inspectors to investigate admins?

Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Mon Sep 11 14:58:35 UTC 2006


David Gerard wrote:
> On 11/09/06, Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> I think that forcing new customs or rules which comes from the "top"
>> might create a natural opposision. I think the best place to put such
>> a general "good customs" translations would be rather meta. Then it
>> might be a good starting point how to slowly apply it to the all
>> projects after duscussion within project's communities which should
>> individally decide how to "customize" them to the nature and current
>> rules of their projects.
>>     
>
>
> I'm working on an essay about process in my en: userspace:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/Process_is_Dangerous
>
> Process is there to help write an encyclopedia. Beyond that, it must
> stay completely malleable. Important considerations are NPOV,
> verifiability and no original research. For community maintenance,
> assume good faith and no personal attacks; and don't bite the newbies,
> since they seem to write most of the actual content, on en: at least.
>
>
> - d.
Hoi,
Given that this is Foundation, no original research should be less of a 
criteria. It is very much what you want in an encyclopaedia, but for 
other projects it is not necessarily that great.
Thanks,
     GerardM



More information about the wikimedia-l mailing list