<div><div><div>In #1, the query asked was -<br><br><i>what are the points you feel need improving and what is the best way to resolve them?</i><br><br>to which there was one reply only of Debastein. Thanks, Deba.<br><br>Since
we cannot wait longer and need to go ahead with the class, let us
begin. First of all, we must understand the purpose of this query - to
exercise your understanding of the issues involved, to make you assess
their importance, prioritise and list them. Various sources for input in
preparing this query were given.<br>
<br>A simple understanding of the issues involved is given below.<br><br>Firstly,
before we submit the page for GA Nomination once again, we have to
satisfy ourselves not only regarding the Good Article Criteria (listed in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria</a> ), but also to understand the key defects indicated by User:TonyTheTiger during his GA review. The GA criteriamay be postponed to the point after all the major identified defects are rectified, which include:<br>
<br>* Article too large - needs reduction/thinning.<br>* Lead defective, needs rewriting.<br>* Referencing required.<br>* Specific issues at Disambiguation report & deadlinks<br>* Infobox clarification.<br><br>The FA review being of 2009 vintage is of less relevance now except the following which could still be live issues:<br>
* Image review required to identify & remove images under fair use criteria.<br>* Structure needs tweaking.<br>* Referencing needs completion & cleanup.<br><br>Hence the GA process will undergo three steps:<br>* Step one - Address the identified concerns.<br>
* Step two - Review the amended work with GA criteria and rectify them.<br>* Step three - Address the points of the reviewing GA editor during the GA process..<br>
<br>Based on the above, Step one actions should probably comprise the following in sequence:<br>* Structure needs tweaking. <br>* Article too large - needs reduction/thinning.<br>* Lead defective, needs rewriting.<br>* Referencing required for those facts without it & {{cn}} templates.<div>
<br>and the following which can be done anytime independently of the major rewrite above:<br><div>* Specific issues at Disambiguation report & deadlinks<br>* Infobox clarification.<div>* Image review required to identify & remove images under fair use criteria.</div>
<div>* Referencing needs completion & cleanup.<br><br>Shortly, we shall take up #2 - reference cleanup, completion etc.<br></div><div><br clear="all">Warm regards,<br><br>Ashwin Baindur<br>------------------------------------------------------</div>
</div></div>
</div></div></div>