I am one of the people who has done a substantial amount of work on Wikimedia Canada for
the last couple years, but I am not one of the people on the incorporation list. I do not
feel insulted by being left off the list because based on the discussions that have read,
I have confidence that the people who signed the incorporation documents will run a fair
election for board members and hope that the people we elect as board members will be
transparent.
The people on this list should know that there were emails sent to a small group after
August 7 discussing the incorporation papers, but those emails were discussing the
logistics of registration and did not make any changes to the bylaws and policy that are
not on the website.
The one topic that was discussed in those emails that the larger group may want to discuss
is what name we will use if the government rejects the name "Wiki Canada" for
sounding like a government department. If you have any comments about that, feel free to
start a thread about it in this email list.
As far as I know, there have been no other backroom discussions.
–Jeffery Nichols, M.A.
(User:Arctic.gnome)
On 2010-11-27, at 22:25 , Amgine wrote:
I suggest transparency and communications before
making commitments on
behalf of members, such as creating the rules and regulations by which
the members would be governed. Writing off the community's involvement
*now* is no better than writing it off *before* you submitted without
review.
Having previously created the minimal set of rules required and offering
to pay for all necessary legal and incorporation fees, I'm both well
aware of how disingenuous your comments are and utterly unwilling to be
condescended to. Get off that high horse, it's dead.
Amgine
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-ca mailing list
Wikimedia-ca(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-ca