2010/6/21 Juliana da Costa José <juliana(a)wikimania2010.pl>pl>:
My oppinion as an actual working member of this year
Wikimania, would be to
discuss this after the venue. If everything is finished, the leading team
will write a report about the things which happened positivly and negativly.
I think on this base it would be more revealing to discuss alterations in
familiar Wikimania structure of planning.
Every year there has been a plan to write a report afterwards on what
went well, what didn't, etc.. Has such a report ever actually been
written? I've never seen one (sometimes we get the results of a survey
of attendees with some minimal analysis, but that's about it). It
would be really good if we could get such a report, especially this
year since there definitely have been things that have gone wrong. (I
know it is very tempting, and understandable, to collapse in
exhaustion once the event is finished and never get around to writing
the report - I've done exactly the same thing before - so I'm not
blaming anyone, just emphasising how useful such a report would be.)