<DIV>I have no problem with this, as long as it's for logged in users and not for anons.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>RickK<BR><BR><B><I>Jake Nelson <jnelson@soncom.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Fred Bauder wrote:<BR>> They just need to quit blocking people without authorization. We have a<BR>> procedure. Try talk, then mediation, then appeal to Jimbo if mediation<BR>> doesn't work to request Jimbo to ask for arbitration.<BR><BR>Here's a thought- have the blocking code require two sysops to both do it to<BR>take effect, at least in the case of logged-in users. Might solve some of<BR>these issues.<BR><BR>-- Jake<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Yahoo! Finance: <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=22055/*http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html">Get your refund fast by filing online</a>