<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/1.0.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 23:06, Toby Bartels wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote in part:</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I></FONT></FONT></I></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<FONT SIZE="3"></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<PRE><FONT SIZE="3">></FONT><FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>Now at the other end of things, maybe at this point on the English</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>>wikipedia we have enough sysops in attendance at any one time, that it</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>>would not be unreasonable to require two concurring sysops to perform</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>>sysopactions which are uncommonly needed but potentially particularly</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>>controversial. I am thinking about unprotection of pages and undeletion</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>>as well.</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I></FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>Undeletion should never require more official validation than deletion.</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I></FONT></FONT></I></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
The inclusion of the word "never" in your argument; and the absence of a stated justification for your view; suggests that your position is a dogmatic one. Am I mischaractericising your attitude?
<BR>
<BR>
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen (aka Cimon Avaro)
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>